Academic research inside organizations: Inputs, processes, and outcomes

77Citations
Citations of this article
88Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Although many opinions have been expressed about the potential merits and pitfalls of conducting academic research inside organizations, empirical research on the question is nearly nonexistent. Consequently, the present study examined the origins, processes, and outcomes of 141 academic research projects that were conducted in (nonacademic) organizations and published in 4 top-tier industrial/organizational psychology and management journals over a 3-year period. Three outcomes were assessed: implementation of research findings, academic-organizational relationship continuation, and research impact (as measured by other-author citations). Results suggested a number of relationships between the way projects began, the relative contributions of organizations and authors to the research process, and eventual outcomes. Suggestions for future research are offered.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Rynes, S. L., Mc Natt, D. B., & Bretz, R. D. (1999). Academic research inside organizations: Inputs, processes, and outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 52(4), 869–898. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1999.tb00183.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free