"Lineage addiction" in human cancer: Lessons from integrated genomics

27Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Genome-era advances in the field of oncology endorse the notion that many tumors may prove vulnerable to targeted therapeutic avenues once their salient molecular alterations are elucidated. Accomplishing this requires both detailed genomic characterization and the ability to identify in situ the critical dependencies operant within individual tumors. To this end, DNA microarray platforms such as high-density single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) arrays enable large-scale cancer genome characterization, including copy number and loss-of-heterozygosity analyses at high resolution. Clustering analyses of SNP array data from a large collection of tumor samples and cell lines suggest that certain copy number alterations correlate strongly with the tissue of origin. Such lineage-restricted alterations may harbor novel cancer genes directing genesis or progression of tumors from distinct tissue types. We have explored this notion through combined analysis of genome-scale data sets from the NCI60 cancer cell line collection. Here, several melanoma cell lines clustered on the basis of increased dosage at a region of chromosome 3p containing the master melanocyte regulator MITF. Combined analysis of gene expression data and additional functional studies established MITF as an amplified oncogene in melanoma. MITF may therefore represent a nodal point within a critical lineage survival pathway operant in a subset of melanomas. These findings suggest that, like oncogene addiction, "lineage addiction" may represent a fundamental tumor survival mechanism with important therapeutic implications. © 2005 Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Garraway, L. A., Weir, B. A., Zhao, X., Widlund, H., Beroukhim, R., Berger, A., … Sellers, W. R. (2005). “Lineage addiction” in human cancer: Lessons from integrated genomics. In Cold Spring Harbor Symposia on Quantitative Biology (Vol. 70, pp. 25–34). https://doi.org/10.1101/sqb.2005.70.016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free