Abstract
Purpose: To compare fully quantitative and semiquantitative analysis of rest and stress myocardial blood flow (MBF) and myocardial perfusion reserve (MPR) using a dual-bolus first-pass perfusion MRI method in humans. Materials and Methods: Rest and dipyridamole stress perfusion imaging was performed on 10 healthy humans by administering gadolinium contrast using a dual-bolus protocol. Ventricular and myocardial time-signal intensity curves were generated from a series of T1-weighted images and adjusted for surface-coil intensity variations. Corrected signal intensity curves were then fitted using fully quantitative model constrained deconvolution (MCD) to quantify MBF (mL/min/g) and MPR. The results were compared with semiquantitative contrast enhancement ratio (CER) and upslope index (SLP) measurements. Results: MBF (mL/min/g) estimated with MCD averaged 1.02 ± 0.22 at rest and 3.39 ± 0.59 for stress with no overlap in measures. MPR was 3.43 ± 0.71, 1.91 ± 0.65, and 1.16 ± 0.19 using MCD, SLP, and CER. Both semiquantitative parameters (SLP and CER) significantly underestimated MPR (P < 0.001) and failed to completely discriminate rest and stress perfusion. Conclusion: Rest and stress MBF (mL/min/g) and MPR estimated by dual-bolus perfusion MRI fit within published ranges. Semiquantitative methods (SLP and CER) significantly underestimated MPR. © 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hsu, L. Y., Rhoads, K. L., Holly, J. E., Kellman, P., Aletras, A. H., & Arai, A. E. (2006). Quantitative myocardial perfusion analysis with a dual-bolus contrast-enhanced first-pass MRI technique in humans. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 23(3), 315–322. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20502
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.