On the Cul-de-Sac vs. checker-board street network: Search for sustainable urban form

5Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The study revisited the largely accepted idea to deal with sprawl by replacing cul-de-sac/curve-linear street with the traditional checkerboard system in community design. Recent discussions suggest that a neighborhood with cul-de-sac street pattern can promote accessibility and street connectivity, if it is designed integrated with open space and pedestrian paths, while creating safe and quiet residential environments. A good example is the discarded old wisdom, the Radburn. To date, the past researchers did not acknowledge the potential of the cul-de-sac neighborhoods in achieving the benefits New Urbansits strive to accomplish. This study tried to fill this gap by comparing a conventional suburban neighborhood, a neighborhood with creative cul-de-sac street pattern, and the grid street neighborhood.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Zhang, M. (2013). On the Cul-de-Sac vs. checker-board street network: Search for sustainable urban form. International Review for Spatial Planning and Sustainable Development, 1(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.14246/irspsd.1.1_1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free