Enhancing the inclusion of gender and sexually diverse populations in evaluation: Reflections grounded in practice

3Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Evaluators are committed to practice that is high quality and conducted ethically. Despite this, gender and sexually diverse populations are not always adequately considered in evaluation practice. Ensuring fuller inclusion of gender and sexually diverse people is required to give effect to human rights obligations and to enable comparatively poorer wellbeing outcomes for these groups to be addressed. Based on our experience conducting evaluation (and research) with both general populations and gender and sexually diverse populations, we suggest a need to build inclusive practice among evaluators. To guide inclusive evaluation practice, we outline three domains for consideration – terminology and language, processes of research inclusion and implications of inclusion. These are not offered as a checklist but as a way to encourage reflexive practice among evaluators. Given evaluators are often concerned with promoting equity and social justice, we are hopeful that actions taken by evaluators can enhance the inclusion of gender and sexually diverse people in evaluation activities and contribute to better wellbeing outcomes for them.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Adams, J., & Neville, S. (2021). Enhancing the inclusion of gender and sexually diverse populations in evaluation: Reflections grounded in practice. Evaluation Journal of Australasia, 21(4), 189–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/1035719X211043674

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free