Betrayal, Trust and Loyalty

5Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

I argue that while every betrayal is a breach of trust, not every breach of trust is a betrayal. I defend a conception of trust as primarily a feature of behaviour (i.e. trusting behaviour) and only secondarily a feature of a mental attitude. So it is possible to have the attitude of distrust towards someone while still trusting them in the way you behave. This makes sense of the possibility of Judas Iscariot breaching Jesus’ trust, and so betraying him, even though Jesus presumably knew that Judas would do just that. This conception of trust may be spelt out in terms of making oneself reliant on somebody in a collaboration with them. Such collaborations include relationships like friendships and love affairs, as well as political activities or defending one’s country against aggression. I argue that only when these collaborations involve a commitment to loyalty is a breach of trust a betrayal. And loyalty is a feature of those collaborations or relationships that exclude others–us/them collaborations.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Stout, R. (2022). Betrayal, Trust and Loyalty. International Journal of Philosophical Studies, 30(3), 339–356. https://doi.org/10.1080/09672559.2022.2121892

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free