Research Misconduct and Medical Journals

1Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Journal editors often deal with allegations of research misconduct, defined by the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) in the United States as fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism. It is important that editors have a transparent and consistent process to deal with these allegations quickly and fairly. This process will include the authors and may include research integrity officers at the sponsoring institution as well as funders. Retractions may not be consistent with the ORI definition, for example, specifying inadequate peer-review and unreported conflict of interest, but nevertheless represent scientific misconduct.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bauchner, H., Steinbrook, R., & Redberg, R. F. (2025). Research Misconduct and Medical Journals. In Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics (Vol. 53, pp. 35–40). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/jme.2025.35

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free