Biomechanical comparison of distal femoral fracture fixation: Analysis of non-locked, locked, and far-cortical locked constructs

7Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

To assess whether far-cortical locking (FCL) screws alter the fracture site strain environment and allow shorter bridge plate constructs for supracondylar femoral fractures, we tested the fracture site displacement under force of synthetic left femora with a 5-cm metaphyseal fracture gap, modeling comminution. Five models of nine constructs were tested (three types of diaphyseal screws [nonlocking, locking, and FCL] and two plate lengths [13 holes and 5 holes]). Long plate models using three or four diaphyseal screws (working length 13.5 or 7.5 cm, respectively) were compared with short plates with three diaphyseal screws (working length 7.5 cm). Models were loaded axially and torsionally; 100 cycles in random order. Primary outcome measures were axial and torsional fracture site stiffness. FCL screws decreased rotational stiffness 19% (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Riedel, M. D., Oppizzi, G., O’Hara, N. N., Zhang, C., Koh, K., Slobogean, G. P., … O’Toole, R. V. (2020). Biomechanical comparison of distal femoral fracture fixation: Analysis of non-locked, locked, and far-cortical locked constructs. Journal of Orthopaedic Research, 38(12), 2573–2579. https://doi.org/10.1002/jor.24756

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free