Conspiracy beliefs and negative attitudes towards outgroups in times of crises: Experimental evidence from Germany

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

While research on the determinants of conspiracy beliefs has been growing, there is still limited attention given to the broader consequences of conspiracy theories. This study examines the effects of conspiratorial framing on outgroup evaluations in the context of societal crises. Using an experimental design and a large representative sample of the German population, we exposed participants to conspiratorial framings of health, economic, and security crisis scenarios. The findings reveal that exposure to conspiratorial framing of crises leads to significantly more negative attitudes towards outgroups compared to control conditions. The impact is most pronounced in the security crisis treatment condition, particularly in war scenarios. Additionally, our study demonstrates the important role of political ideology, as individuals with left- as well as right-wing ideologies displayed more negative attitudes towards outgroups when exposed to conspiratorial framings of crises. These findings contribute to the literature by providing experimental evidence of the detrimental effects of conspiracy narratives on intergroup attitudes during crises.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Endtricht, R., & Kanol, E. (2024). Conspiracy beliefs and negative attitudes towards outgroups in times of crises: Experimental evidence from Germany. PLoS ONE, 19(11 November). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0312418

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free