When social networks polarize: On the number of clusters in the Hegselmann–Krause model

0Citations
Citations of this article
1Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In the present paper, we study opinion dynamics in a social network, where individuals only listen to those with opinion not farther away than a given threshold from their own opinion (known as bounded confidence models, proposed by Hegselmann and Krause). It is well known that in bounded confidence models consensus does not always exist, and that agents split in clusters (polarization), with convergence to consensus in each cluster. We are precisely interested in the effect of bounded confidence on polarization in the network. Our main focus concerns the formation of clusters and their number, as well as its non-monotonicity with respect to the value of the threshold. First, a framework with a finite number of agents is considered. We study analytically disintegration of various types of opinion chains (clusters), and investigate by simulation the likelihood of chains of a certain length and their disintegration. Next, we examine the (non-)monotonicity of the number of clusters with respect to the threshold for a given initial vector of opinions and in expectation. Finally, we analyse in a formal way the formation of clusters in a model with a continuum of agents.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

de Vos, W., Grabisch, M., & Rusinowska, A. (2026). When social networks polarize: On the number of clusters in the Hegselmann–Krause model. Mathematical Social Sciences, 141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mathsocsci.2026.102530

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free