Comparison of epidural and intravenous route for acute and chronic postoperative pain control in patients with gynecological malignancy

3Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objectives: This study compared the effects of patient-controlled epidural and intravenous analgesia on acute and chronic postoperative pain in patients who were operated on for gynecological malignancy. Methods: Postoperatively, patient-controlled analgesia was administered via epidural route to Group 1 and the intravenous route to Group 2. Pain was evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) in the acute phase at postoperative 24 hours and at 6 months in the chronic phase. Results: The VAS scores at 24 hours were lower in Group 1 than in Group 2 (3.29 vs 3.93; p<0.05). The VAS scores at 6 months were 2.03 in Group 1 and 2.53 in Group 2, indicating no statistically significant difference (p>0.05). There was no significant difference in the Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs pain scale scores at 6 months (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results showed that epidural and intravenous analgesia had a similar effect regarding the chronicity of pain but better outcomes were achieved with epidural analgesia in the acute stage.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Balkan, B., Demirayak, G., Çetingök, H., Comba, C., Yener, Y. Z., Hergünsel, G. O., & Özdemir, I. A. (2020). Comparison of epidural and intravenous route for acute and chronic postoperative pain control in patients with gynecological malignancy. Agri, 32(2), 91–98. https://doi.org/10.14744/agri.2019.26986

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free