The NAME trial: A direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer

8Citations
Citations of this article
48Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is in general given in cycles of maximum tolerated doses to potentially maximize the therapeutic outcome. However, when compared with targeted therapies for MBC, conventional and dose intensified chemotherapy has caused only modest survival benefits during the recent decades, often compromising the quality of life considerably. Navelbine is an antineoplastic agent that has shown efficacy in the treatment of a variety of cancer types, including breast cancer. Early clinical trials involving both breast cancer and lung cancer patients suggest that metronomic dosing of Navelbine might be at least as effective as classical administration (once weekly, etc.). The NAME trial compares these two strategies of Navelbine administration in MBC patients.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Langkjer, S. T., Kenholm, J., Jensen, J. D., Wedervang, K., Brixen, A. T., Grunnet, M., … Geisler, J. (2019). The NAME trial: A direct comparison of classical oral Navelbine versus Metronomic Navelbine in metastatic breast cancer. Future Oncology, 15(22), 2561–2569. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2019-0124

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free