Interpreting the flexibilities under the TRIPS agreement

Abstract

While the TRIPS Agreement provides for minimum standards of protec-tion of intellectual property, it leaves certain degree of policy space for WTO members, whether developed or developing countries, to implement the Agree-ment's provisions in different manners, to legislate in areas not subject to the minimum standards under the Agreement, and to develop legal interpretations of such provisions to determine the scope and content of the applicable obligations. This paper focuses on some aspects of how panels and the Appellate Body of the WTO have interpreted said provisions. The paper also draws general conclusions for the implementation of TRIPS flexibilities, which are of crucial importance for the design of a pro-competitive intellectual property system and, in particular, for achieving public health objectives, as specifically recognized by the Doha Declara-tion on TRIPS and Public Health.