Comparison between (311-312 nm) narrow band ultraviolet-B phototherapy and (308 nm) monochromatic excimer light phototherapy in treatment of vitiligo: A histopathological study

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Recently, the monochromatic excimer light (MEL) of 308 nm wavelength has shown some advantages in comparison to narrow band ultraviolet B (NB-UVB) for the treatment of vitiligo. To histopathologically compare the early effects of NB-UVB and 308-nm MEL phototherapy on vitiliginous patches using H & E and HMB-45. Methods: Thirty subjects with non-segmental vitiligo lesions were treated twice a week for 6 weeks with 308-nm MEL, while NB-UVB was used to treat lesions contra laterally. Skin biopsies were taken from lesional areas before and after 6 weeks of treatment by either modality. It was prepared for light microscopy and immunohistochemical study (HMB-45). This study was performed as a clinical trial (Trial registration: http://www.pactr.org; Identifier: PACTR201705002279419) Results: All lesions before treatment had labeling index (number of pigmented cells/non-pigmented cells) of 0.0 (0%). After treatment the LI for MEL was 4.2 ± 2.6, while for NB-UVB LI it was 0.3 ± 0.7. MEL showed higher statistical significance regarding increase of basal pigmented cells, and significant decrease in vacuolated keratinocytes and basal membrane thickness than NB-UVB. Conclusion: Although NB-UVB is considered as treatment of choice for vitiligo, MEL is acknowledged as an effective treatment modality for vitiliginous lesions that induces more repigmentation than NB-UVB, and more rapidly, as confirmed by our study.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Salah Eldin, M. M., Sami, N. A., Aly, D. G., & Hanafy, N. S. (2017). Comparison between (311-312 nm) narrow band ultraviolet-B phototherapy and (308 nm) monochromatic excimer light phototherapy in treatment of vitiligo: A histopathological study. Journal of Lasers in Medical Sciences, 8(3), 123–127. https://doi.org/10.15171/jlms.2017.22

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free