Using Milestones as Evaluation Metrics During an Emergency Medicine Clerkship

7Citations
Citations of this article
42Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background The Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education's (ACGME) Milestones presumes graduating medical students will enter residency proficient at Milestone level 1 for 23 skills. The Next Accreditation System now includes Milestones for each postgraduate specialty, and it is unlikely that schools will document every emergency medicine (EM) applicant's EM-specific skills in their performance evaluation. Objectives The goals of this research were to determine if assessment of the Milestones was feasible during a medical student clerkship and examine the proportion of medical students performing at Milestone level 1. Methods This study was conducted at a center with Liaison Committee on Medical Education–approved medical training and a 4-year EM residency. Using traditional clerkship, we studied the feasibility of an ACGME EM Milestones–based clerkship assessment. Data led to redesign of the clerkship and its evaluation process, including all level 1 anchor(s) to add “occasionally” (>60%), “usually” (>80%), and “always” (100%) on a Likert scale to on-shift assessment forms. Results During the feasibility phase (2013–14), 75 students rotated though the clerkship; 55 evaluations were issued and 50 contained the Milestone summary. Eight deficiencies were noted in Milestone 12 and three in Milestone 14. After changes, 49 students rotated under the new evaluation rubric. Of 575 completed on-shift evaluations, 16 Milestone deficiencies were noted. Of 41 institutional evaluations issued, only one student had deficiencies noted, all of which pertained to patient care. All evaluations in this second cohort contained each student's Milestone proficiency. Conclusions Assessment of the Milestones is feasible. Communication of ACGME EM Milestone proficiency may identify students who require early observation or remediation. The majority of students meet the anchors for the Milestones, suggesting that clerkship assessment with the ACGME EM Milestones does not adequately differentiate students.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Quinn, S. M., Worrilow, C. C., Jayant, D. A., Bailey, B., Eustice, E., Kohlhepp, J., … Kane, B. G. (2016). Using Milestones as Evaluation Metrics During an Emergency Medicine Clerkship. In Journal of Emergency Medicine (Vol. 51, pp. 426–431). Elsevier USA. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemermed.2016.06.014

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free