Study on Durability of Recycled Large Aggregate Concrete

6Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper, natural large aggregate concrete (NAC) and recycled large aggregate concrete (RAC) are prepared. The impermeability, carbonation resistance, chloride ion penetration resistance, early crack resistance and dry shrinkage of the two kinds of concrete are compared and studied. The results show that, compared with NAC, when cured to the same age (28d), the water seepage height of RAC increased by 23.11%, and its relative permeability coefficient increased by 40.81%; carbonization depth increased by 14.63%; 6h chloride ion electric flux increased by 24.85%, chloride ion diffusion coefficient increased by 24.90%; the number of cracks per unit area increased by 68.88%, and the total crack area per unit area increased by 37.80%. The dry shrinkage rate increased by 50.46%. Although RAC's durability is worse than NAC, RAC prepared by reasonable technology has the same performance as NAC and can be used instead of NAC to some extent.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chen, J., Liu, L., Zhou, M., Huang, Z., Li, R., Zhang, Z., & He, B. (2019). Study on Durability of Recycled Large Aggregate Concrete. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 371). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/371/4/042016

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free