An Understanding of (Mis)Understanders: Exploring the Underlying Mechanisms of Concept Learning Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging

3Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Obtaining adequate understanding of scientific concepts is considered challenging due to learners' misconceptions about natural phenomena. Misconceptions may coexist with scientific knowledge in the brain. Therefore, misconceptions must be cognitively inhibited in order to select the scientific knowledge. There is, however, lack of substantial neuroscientific evidence supporting this hypothesis. In this study, we sought for this evidence by investigating medical students who solved a cardiovascular conceptual problem in a magnetic resonance imaging scanner. Brain activation was compared between understanders who had the scientific knowledge, and misunderstanders who held a misconception. No significant activation was found in brain areas related to cognitive inhibition in understanders compared with misunderstanders. Therefore, we could not confirm the idea that cognitive inhibition is involved in overcoming a misconception. Instead, we found that the putamen was significantly activated in misunderstanders compared with understanders, suggesting a role for episodic memory in learners holding a misconception.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Versteeg, M., Hafkemeijer, A., de Beaufort, A. J., & Steendijk, P. (2021). An Understanding of (Mis)Understanders: Exploring the Underlying Mechanisms of Concept Learning Using Functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Mind, Brain, and Education, 15(1), 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/mbe.12273

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free