Randomized phase 3, multicenter, open-label study comparing evofosfamide (Evo) in combination with doxorubicin (D) vs. D alone in patients (pts) with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS): Study TH-CR-406/SARC021

  • Tap W
  • Papai Z
  • van Tine B
  • et al.
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Methods: This was a multi-national, open-label, randomized (1:1) Phase 3 study of Evo (300 mg/m2) IV on Days 1 and 8 (21-day cycle) with D on Day 1 vs. D alone (75 mg/m2, bolus or continuous). Pts on Evo plus D could receive Evo alone after Cycle 6. Key eligibility: locally advanced unresectable or metastatic STS, intermediate or high grade, no prior chemotherapy for advanced disease, ECOG 0/1, measurable disease (RECIST 1.1). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). The study had 85% power and one-sided alpha of 2.5% to detect 33% improvement in OS. Secondary endpoints were PFS, response rate (RR) and safety.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Tap, W., Papai, Z., van Tine, B., Attia, S., Ganjoo, K., Jones, R. L., … Schoffski, P. (2016). Randomized phase 3, multicenter, open-label study comparing evofosfamide (Evo) in combination with doxorubicin (D) vs. D alone in patients (pts) with advanced soft tissue sarcoma (STS): Study TH-CR-406/SARC021. Annals of Oncology, 27, vi483. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw388.01

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free