Progress and pitfalls in gerontological theorizing

17Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Since 1988, there has been a commendable increase in concern for explicit theory development in gerontology. However, this has not been reflected in recent journal articles reporting empirical research. We summarize some central issues in the recent history of gerontological theory- building, noting both 'progress' and 'pitfalls.' Have there been paradigmatic shifts in biogerontological, psycho-gerontological, and social- gerontological theories of aging during the past decade? We think not, though advocates of particular theoretical perspectives may disagree.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bengtson, V. L., Parrott, T. M., & Burgess, E. O. (1996). Progress and pitfalls in gerontological theorizing. In Gerontologist (Vol. 36, pp. 768–772). Gerontological Society of America. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/36.6.768

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free