A new probabilistic problem-solving paradigm: A conceptual critical reflection

0Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

For Coase, organisations exist because they manage resources more efficiently than markets can. In contrast, for Grant, organisations exist because they are more efficient at integrating knowledge. Therefore, according to Grant, certain types of knowledge, such as tacit knowledge, cannot be transferred efficiently; problem solving therefore needs to be devolved to the level of the individual. Similarly, the work of Hayek and von Hippel suggests that knowledge is ‘sticky’ and cannot easily be transferred. In this paper the argument is made that a second generation of problem solving research and development management systems need to be developed; as a global system of distributed problem solving, in order to be able to deal with specific types of problems, termed ‘catastrophic events’, that may arise.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Callaghan, C. W. (2014). A new probabilistic problem-solving paradigm: A conceptual critical reflection. Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, 5(23), 2070–2079. https://doi.org/10.5901/mjss.2014.v5n23p2070

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free