Abstract
We have recently realized that the significant digits reported in Table I of the original paper for the parameters of the DD-MEd interaction are not sufficient to accurately reproduce the results published in the same paper. The reason can be easily understood by considering that, for example, in the prediction of masses, there exists a strong cancellation between the contributions of the different meson fields that can be, separately, very large [1]. Specifically, we have checked that one would need to use the value of the parameters with seven significant digits. In Table I below, we give all the parameters of the DD-MEd functional with seven significant digits. (Table Presented).
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Roca-Maza, X., Viñas, X., Centelles, M., Ring, P., & Schuck, P. (2016, June 27). Erratum: Relativistic mean-field interaction with density-dependent meson-nucleon vertices based on microscopical calculations (Physical Review C (2011) 84 (054309) DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevC.84.054309). Physical Review C. American Physical Society. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.069905
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.