Abstract
Common participatory design and community consultation practices often tokenize participants' input. This can limit the depth of information shared, lead to disconnected understandings of site, and perpetuate hierarchical structures between designers, planners and the communities they seek to serve. Sticks, Ropes, Land proposes alternative approaches for engaging with community stewards and groups who get marginalized in the design of public space. Through the development of practices that pair material-based methods of making with activities grounded in direct connections to place, Sticks, Ropes, Land puts forward approaches to participatory design that aim to question and problematize colonial structures in relation to public space design. This paper examines a series of three approaches that designers might consider towards the work of serving and supporting the agency and rights of place-based communities.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kozak, L. E., Falk, C. A., & Chisholm, C. J. (2020). Sticks, Ropes, Land: Confronting Colonial Practices in Public Space Design. In ACM International Conference Proceeding Series (Vol. 2, pp. 63–67). Association for Computing Machinery. https://doi.org/10.1145/3384772.3385140
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.