A comparative study on vertical dynamic responses of three types of elevated railway tracks subjected to a moving train

10Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

A theoretical model incorporating the moving train, the railway track, and the elevated viaduct is established and then solved using periodic theory in this paper. The vertical wheel/rail forces and the dynamic responses of track and viaduct girder are obtained and compared for three different types of tracks, i.e., the double-block ballastless track, the rubber-pad floating slab track, and the steel-spring floating slab track. It is observed that the rubber-pad and steel-spring floating slab tracks can reduce more than 10% of the wheel/rail force and the reaction force at girder supports, when compared to those of the double-block ballastless track. Especially, the steel-spring floating slab track develops an uplifting force larger than the installation force of the fastening clip, which may cause failure of the rail fastening system.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Shi, L., Ye, X., Zhang, P., & Guo, L. (2019). A comparative study on vertical dynamic responses of three types of elevated railway tracks subjected to a moving train. Mathematical Problems in Engineering, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1155/2019/3290958

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free