A practitioner's guide to geospatial analysis in a neuroimaging context

4Citations
Citations of this article
15Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction: Health disparities arise from biological-environmental interactions. Neuroimaging cohorts are reaching sufficiently large sample sizes such that analyses could evaluate how the environment affects the brain. We present a practical guide for applying geospatial methods to a neuroimaging cohort. Methods: We estimated brain age gap (BAG) from structural magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) from 239 city-dwelling participants in St. Louis, Missouri. We compared these participants to population-level estimates from the American Community Survey (ACS). We used geospatial analysis to identify neighborhoods associated with patterns of altered brain structure. We also evaluated the relationship between Area Deprivation Index (ADI) and BAG. Results: We identify areas in St. Louis, Missouri that were significantly associated with higher BAG from a spatially representative cohort. We provide replication code. Conclusion: We observe a relationship between neighborhoods and brain health, which suggests that neighborhood-based interventions could be appropriate. We encourage other studies to geocode participant information to evaluate biological-environmental interaction.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wisch, J. K., Babulal, G. M., Petersen, K., Millar, P. R., Shacham, E., Scroggins, S., … Ances, B. M. (2023). A practitioner’s guide to geospatial analysis in a neuroimaging context. Alzheimer’s and Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment and Disease Monitoring, 15(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/dad2.12413

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free