A comprehensive review of interpretable machine learning techniques for phishing attack detection

4Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Phishing attacks remain a significant and evolving threat in the digital landscape, demanding continual advancements in detection methodologies. This paper emphasizes the importance of interpretable machine learning models to enhance transparency and trustworthiness in phishing detection systems. It begins with an overview of phishing attacks, their increasing sophistication, and the challenges faced by conventional detection techniques. A range of interpretable machine learning approaches, including rule-based models, decision trees, and additive models like Shapley additive explanations (SHAP), are surveyed. Their applicability in phishing detection is analyzed based on computational efficiency, prediction accuracy, and interpretability. The study also explores ways to integrate these methods into existing detection systems to enhance functionality and user experience. By providing insights into the decision-making processes of detection models, interpretable machine learning facilitates human supervision and intervention, strengthening overall system reliability. The paper concludes by outlining future research directions, such as improving the scalability, accuracy, and adaptability of interpretable models to detect emerging phishing techniques. Integrating these models with real-time threat intelligence and deep learning approaches could boost accuracy while preserving transparency. Additionally, user-centric explanations and human-in-the-loop systems may further enhance trust, usability, and resilience in phishing detection frameworks.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chandre, P., Bhujbal, P., Jadhav, A., Shendkar, B. D., Wangikar, A., & Sachdeo, R. (2025). A comprehensive review of interpretable machine learning techniques for phishing attack detection. IAES International Journal of Artificial Intelligence, 14(4), 3022–3032. https://doi.org/10.11591/ijai.v14.i4.pp3022-3032

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free