Transaxillary gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis

16Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim: This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates surgical outcome and safety results of conventional (OT) versus endoscopic transaxillary gasless thyroidectomies (ET). Material and methods: A systematic literature search was performed. The weighted mean differences or the odd ratios with corresponding 95% CIs were examined for surgical outcomes and complications. The results were analysed using fixed- or random-effects models. The heterogeneity was checked by the Cochran Q test and the extent of inconsistency was evaluated by the I2 statistic. Results: Ten studies and 1597 patients were included. All studies found that ET required longer operative time. Postoperative pain was significantly lower after ET on day 1 and day 7. No statistical difference was found in complication rates. Conclusions: ET has disadvantages such as longer surgery time, but it is a feasible and safe procedure with lower postoperative pain and comparable complication rates to OT. However, good quality prospective randomised studies are necessary to draw firmer conclusions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jasaitis, K., Midlenko, A., Bekenova, A., Ignatavicius, P., Gulbinas, A., & Dauksa, A. (2021). Transaxillary gasless endoscopic thyroidectomy versus conventional open thyroidectomy: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Wideochirurgia I Inne Techniki Maloinwazyjne. Termedia Publishing House Ltd. https://doi.org/10.5114/WIITM.2021.105722

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free