Preschool vision screening frequency after an office-based training session for primary care staff.

13Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although vision screening for preschool children is recommended for detecting amblyopia, many pediatric and family medicine practices do not screen preschool-aged children. The aim of this study was to determine the effect of a training program for primary care clinical staff on vision screening behavior and attitudes. METHODS: All local pediatric and family medicine practices were mailed invitations for free training sessions in preliterate eye chart vision screening. The clinical support staff at each participating practice location received a single training session. The lead ancillary medical employee of each practice location was surveyed immediately before and after training, and again 4 to 6 months later, to determine the effect of a single training session on screening behavior and attitudes. RESULTS: Twenty-nine (26%) of 110 practice locations received training in vision screening. Four to 6 months after training, reported screening frequency of 3-year-olds increased, but not of other ages. The reported comfort level with screening 3-year-olds and 4-year-olds was improved 4 to 6 months after training. Most practices responded that the training was beneficial and worthwhile, but lasting impact on practice behavior for the cohort was modest. CONCLUSIONS: Direct, practical training in preliterate eye chart vision screening may increase the number of 3-year-old children screened and improve clinical support staff comfort with screening preschool children. A single training session is not sufficient in itself, however, to achieve the goal of universal preschool vision screening in the primary care setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hered, R. W., & Rothstein, M. (2003). Preschool vision screening frequency after an office-based training session for primary care staff. Pediatrics, 112(1 Pt 1). https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.112.1.e17

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free