Multidisciplinary tumor board for head and neck cancer from the perspective of medical oncologists—optimizing its effectiveness

6Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Head and neck cancer (HNC) treatment is becoming increasingly multidisciplinary, and patient characteristics vary. Therefore, a multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) is essential in clinical practice. This review provides insights into the benefits and tips for improving head and neck MTB from the perspective of medical oncologists. The MTB is a platform to discuss the optimal application of the standard of care to each case, reach a consensus, and establish a recommendation to support patients’ decision-making. A productive and educational MTB also provides an opportunity to share information on ongoing clinical trials with physicians. Case presentations should be systematic to discuss all new and challenging cases before, during, and after the treatment. Human resource development, particularly of head and neck medical oncologists, is crucial. The type of multidisciplinary network between medical staff and the extent of patient intervention differs among MTB teams. Subsequently, a virtual MTB can establish a medical network between institutions that will contribute to the equalization and centralization of head and neck oncologic care.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yokota, T., Mukaigawa, T., Yasunaga, Y., Ogawa, H., Onoe, T., Yurikusa, T., & Yamashita, A. (2023). Multidisciplinary tumor board for head and neck cancer from the perspective of medical oncologists—optimizing its effectiveness. Frontiers in Oncology. Frontiers Media SA. https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2023.1257853

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free