Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work

36Citations
Citations of this article
100Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The recent anti-racist movements in the United States have inspired a national call for more research on the experiences of racially marginalized and minoritized students in sci-ence, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields. As researchers focused on promoting diversity, equity, and inclusion, we contend that STEM education must, as a dis-cipline, grapple with how analytic approaches may not fully support equity efforts. We dis-cuss how researchers and educational practitioners should more critically approach STEM equity analyses and why modifying our approaches matters for STEM equity goals. Engaging with equity as a process rather than a static goal, we provide a primer of reflective ques-tions to assist researchers with framing, analysis, and interpretation of student-level data frequently used to identify disparities and assess course-level and programmatic interven-tions. This guidance can inform analyses conducted by campus units such as departments and programs, but also across universities and the scientific community to enhance how we understand and address systemic inequity in STEM fields.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Pearson, M. I., Castle, S. D., Matz, R. L., Koester, B. P., & Byrd, W. C. (2022). Integrating Critical Approaches into Quantitative STEM Equity Work. CBE Life Sciences Education, 21(1). https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.21-06-0158

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free