A micro-CT evaluation of the performance of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems in shaping ability of curved root canals

8Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

To compare the shaping ability of different single-file systems in the preparation of mesial curved canals of mandibular molars using micro-CT technology. Fifteen mesial roots of mandibular molars with two independent and curved canals (n = 30) were selected, scanned at a resolution of 26.7 μm anatomically matched, and distributed into three groups (n = 10), according to the preparation system: WaveOne 25.08, Reciproc 25.08, and OneShape 25.06. A final micro-CT scanning was performed, data sets were registered with their respective counterparts, and compared regarding the three-dimensional (volume, surface area, and structure model index-SMI) and two-dimensional (perimeter, area, roundness, major and minor diameters) parameters, as well as, canal transportation, using ANOVA and post hoc Tukey tests (α = 5%). Overall, no difference was observed between groups regarding area, perimeter, volume, surface area, and canal transportation (p > 0.05). Within group, no canal transportation was significantly higherobserved in the apical third (0.10 ± 0.05 mm) compared to coronal (0.08±0.040 mm) and middle (0.07 ± 0.03 mm) thirds (p < 0.05). Structure model index (SMI) was statistically higher after preparation with OneShape instrument (0.36 ± 0.26) compared to other systems (p < 0.05). Within the parameters of this study, similar shaping ability was observed in the preparation of mesial curved root canals of mandibular molars with Reciproc, OneShape and WaveOne systems.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sousa-Neto, M. D., Crozeta, B. M., Lopes, F. C., Mazzi-Chaves, J. F., Pereira, R. D., Silva-Sousa, A. C., … Corrêa Silva-Sousa, Y. T. (2020). A micro-CT evaluation of the performance of rotary and reciprocating single-file systems in shaping ability of curved root canals. Brazilian Oral Research, 34. https://doi.org/10.1590/1807-3107BOR-2020.VOL34.0039

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free