Passing the Turing Test Does Not Mean the End of Humanity

22Citations
Citations of this article
80Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this paper we look at the phenomenon that is the Turing test. We consider how Turing originally introduced his imitation game and discuss what this means in a practical scenario. Due to its popular appeal we also look into different representations of the test as indicated by numerous reviewers. The main emphasis here, however, is to consider what it actually means for a machine to pass the Turing test and what importance this has, if any. In particular does it mean that, as Turing put it, a machine can “think”. Specifically we consider claims that passing the Turing test means that machines will have achieved human-like intelligence and as a consequence the singularity will be upon us in the blink of an eye.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Warwick, K., & Shah, H. (2016). Passing the Turing Test Does Not Mean the End of Humanity. Cognitive Computation, 8(3), 409–419. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12559-015-9372-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free