Evaluation of adherence and persistence with oral versus longacting injectable antipsychotics in patients with early psychosis

32Citations
Citations of this article
35Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: Despite the theory that long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics should be more likely to improve adherence, reduce gaps in therapy, and prevent relapse compared with oral antipsychotics, there is little published evidence on this issue, specifically in patients with early psychosis. Methods: Patients with a new diagnosis for a psychotic disorder between July 1, 2013, and August 31, 2014, were retrospectively evaluated during a 12-month duration. The primary outcomes were adherence and persistence. Adherence was determined by proportion of days with medication, and persistence was defined as zero gaps in medication therapy. The secondary outcome was the number of times a psychiatric acute care service was used. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on their antipsychotic prescription history: oral only, LAI only, or both formulations at separate times throughout the study period. Results: Forty-seven patients met inclusion criteria. The average proportions of days with medication were 32%, 76%, and 75% for the oral, LAI, and both formulations groups, respectively (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Titus-Lay, E. N., Ansara, E. D., Isaacs, A. N., & Ott, C. A. (2018). Evaluation of adherence and persistence with oral versus longacting injectable antipsychotics in patients with early psychosis. Mental Health Clinician, 8(2), 56–62. https://doi.org/10.9740/mhc.2018.03.056

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free