How health care setting affects prenatal providers' risk reduction practices: A qualitative comparison of settings

7Citations
Citations of this article
47Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: We sought to understand how systemic factors might facilitate or impede providers' ability to screen for and intervene on prenatal behavioral risks. Methods: We convened eight focus groups of 60 prenatal care providers to explore methods for assessing and counseling pregnant women about tobacco, alcohol, and illicit drug use. Because practice setting was often mentioned as either an inducement or barrier to risk prevention, we conducted a re-analysis of focus group transcripts to examine systemic factors. Results: Practice setting strongly influenced providers' behavior, and settings differed by continuity of care, availability of resources, and organized support for risk prevention. The most striking contrasts were found between private practice and a large HMO. Conclusion: Each setting had features that facilitated prevention counseling. Understanding such systemic factors could lead to improved risk prevention practices during pregnancy across all health care settings. © The Haworth Press, Inc. All rights reserved.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Gilbert, P., Herzig, K., Thakar, D., Viloria, J., Bogetz, A., Danley, D. W., … Gerbert, B. (2007). How health care setting affects prenatal providers’ risk reduction practices: A qualitative comparison of settings. Women and Health, 45(2), 41–57. https://doi.org/10.1300/J013v45n02_03

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free