Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Analysis is made of the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hourly means constructed from definitive minute data having missing values (gaps). Bootstrap sampling from different data-gap distributions is used to estimate average errors on hourly means as a function of the number of missing data. Absolute and relative error results are calculated for horizontal-intensity, declination, and vertical-component data collected at high, medium, and low magnetic latitudes. For 90% complete coverage (10% missing data), average (RMS) absolute errors on hourly means are generally less than errors permitted by Intermagnet for minute data. As a rule of thumb, the average relative error for hourly means with 10% missing minute data is approximately equal to 10% of the hourly standard deviation of the source minute data.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Love, J. J. (2009). Missing data and the accuracy of magnetic-observatory hour means. Annales Geophysicae, 27(9), 3601–3610. https://doi.org/10.5194/angeo-27-3601-2009

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free