Metabolic profile comparison between follicular fluid and serum in normal cows and those affected by ovarian cysts

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to carry out the metabolic profile comparison between follicular f luid and serum in normal cows and those affected by ovarian cysts (OC). After slaughtering, blood samples and follicular f luids from normal and cystic animals were collected and assayed using commercial kits to determine the concentrations of metabolites (glucose, total protein, total cholesterol, cortisol, triglycerides, urea, creatinine and insulin) and the liver enzymes activity. Data showed that OC were characterized by low levels of glucose, total protein, cholesterol and cortisol in cystic f luid, while urea concentrations were high compared to normal follicular f luid (P<0.001). On the other hand, serum assays of cystic animals revealed very low values of insulin and urea, whereas cortisol levels were relatively high in comparison with the serum of normal cows (P<0.001). Significant correlations between the serum and follicular fluid concentrations of normal cows were found for glucose (r=0.49), total cholesterol (r=0.31), cortisol (r=0.38) and total protein (r=0.63). The highest correlation was found for urea (r=0.86). On contrary, weak correlations were observed between metabolites concentrations in cystic fluid and in serum for normal and cystic cows. In conclusion, OC grow and persist in a metabolic environment, which differs from follicular f luid to blood. These changes may act together and/or separately to ensure the continuous development of OC. To understand a part of the mechanism, the authors propose a deep study about blood-follicle-barrier.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mimoune, N., Kaidi, R., Benaissa, M. H., Bahouh, M. W., Baazizi, R., & Azzouz, M. Y. (2019). Metabolic profile comparison between follicular fluid and serum in normal cows and those affected by ovarian cysts. Macedonian Veterinary Review, 42(1), 51–59. https://doi.org/10.2478/macvetrev-2018-0030

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free