Multivariate assessment of site of lingual nerve

19Citations
Citations of this article
32Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Injury to the lingual nerve can cause debilitating symptoms. The nerve lies in the retromolar region and its anatomical site can vary withinpatients and according to sex, age, and dentate status. To our knowledge, no previous studies have recorded its course from multiple bonylandmarks and examined the association between age, dentate status, and sex, in the same sample. We dissected 30 white cadavers and tookprimary and secondary reference points from the internal oblique ridge. We measured the distance to the lingual nerve in sagittal, vertical,and horizontal planes, and recorded the position where the nerve was closest to the lingual plate. We dissected 46 hemimandibles (23 male,mean age 79 years, range 52-100) of which 26 were from the left side. Mean (SD) sagittal, vertical, and horizontal distances from the primaryreference point were 9.29 (3.41) mm, 9.15 (3.87) mm, and 0.57 (0.56) mm, respectively. Mean (SD) vertical and horizontal distances from thesecondary point were 7.79 (5.45) mm and 0.59 (0.64) mm, respectively. The proximity of the nerve to the lingual plate varied widely (range-13.00 to 15.17 mm from the primary reference point). Dentate status was significant for the sagittal measurement from the primary point,and the vertical measurement from the secondary point. Differences in age, sex, or site of the contralateral nerve were not significant (n = 16pairs). Our findings suggest that the site of the nerve is consistent between and within subjects for sex and age, but not for dentate status. Theassociation between the nerve and the lingual plate varied, which suggests that care must be taken when operating in the area.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dias, G. J., De Silva, R. K., Shah, T., Sim, E., Song, N., Colombage, S., & Cornwall, J. (2015). Multivariate assessment of site of lingual nerve. British Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, 53(4), 347–351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjoms.2015.01.011

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free