Comparison of local recurrence with conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity

126Citations
Citations of this article
111Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Purpose: The use of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) in the treatment of soft tissue sarcoma (STS) of the extremity is increasing, but no large-scale direct comparison has been reported between conventional external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) and IMRT. Results: Treatment groups were comparable in terms of tumor location, histology, tumor size, depth, and use of chemotherapy. Patients treated with IMRT were older (P =.08), had more high-grade lesions (P =.05), close (< 1 mm) or positive margins (P =.04), preoperative radiation (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Folkert, M. R., Singer, S., Brennan, M. F., Kuk, D., Qin, L. X., Kobayashi, W. K., … Alektiar, K. M. (2014). Comparison of local recurrence with conventional and intensity-modulated radiation therapy for primary soft-tissue sarcomas of the extremity. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 32(29), 3236–3241. https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.2013.53.9452

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free