"Can you rely on me?" Evaluating a Confidence HMI for Cooperative, Automated Driving

8Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

First concepts for cooperative driving already illustrate the potential of the cooperation between human drivers and automated vehicles. However, the main influencing factors that determine an efficient and effective cooperation still need to be investigated. We therefore examined the effects of displaying the vehicle's intended decision in a critical situation in combination with a confidence value. In a driving simulator study (N=49), the automated vehicle communicated uncertainty in predicting the behavior of a pedestrian and the participants could support the automation by entering their own decision to stop or drive through. The results show that the time until entering the own decision (system override) was longer when a pending system decision was indicated with a confidence value in the HMI. A low confidence value resulted in the longest interaction times. In addition, trust in automation and usability were lower compared to the baseline cooperative HMI without a confidence value.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Peintner, J. B., Manger, C., & Riener, A. (2022). “Can you rely on me?” Evaluating a Confidence HMI for Cooperative, Automated Driving. In Main Proceedings - 14th International ACM Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, AutomotiveUI 2022 (pp. 340–348). Association for Computing Machinery, Inc. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546976

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free