Cost-effectiveness of maternal vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus in Hong Kong: a decision-analytical analysis

2Citations
Citations of this article
2Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: Maternal vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) showed high vaccine efficacy in preventing severe RSV-associated events in newborns in randomized controlled trials. This cost-effectiveness study evaluated year-round and seasonal maternal RSV vaccination in Hong Kong. Research design and methods: A decision-analytical model was constructed to evaluate the outcomes of three options: Year-round, seasonal, and no vaccination. Direct and indirect costs, RSV-associated lower respiratory infection, hospitalizations, pediatric intensive care unit admissions, deaths, QALYs loss, and incremental cost per QALY saved (ICER) were measured. Results: In base-case analysis, both year-round and seasonal vaccination reduced RSV-related events and saved QALYs at higher costs versus no vaccination. ICERs (versus no vaccination) of year-round (585,340 USD/QALY) and seasonal (560,460 USD/QALY) strategies exceeded willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold 54,101 USD/QALY. Maternal vaccination strategies became cost-effective if RSV vaccine cost < USD67 for seasonal strategy and

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wang, Y., Rui, M., Wei, Q., Leung, T. F., Leung, T. Y., & You, J. H. S. (2025). Cost-effectiveness of maternal vaccination against respiratory syncytial virus in Hong Kong: a decision-analytical analysis. Expert Review of Vaccines, 24(1), 1015–1023. https://doi.org/10.1080/14760584.2025.2589208

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free