Sociotechnical Undergraduate Education for the Future of Natural Resource Production

2Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The greatest challenges for contemporary and future natural resource production are sociotechnical by nature, from public perceptions of mining to responsible mineral supply chains. The term sociotechnical signals that engineered systems have inherent social dimensions that require careful analysis. Sociotechnical thinking is a prerequisite for understanding and promoting social justice and sustainability through one’s professional practices. This article investigates whether and how two different projects enhanced sociotechnical learning in mining and petroleum engineering students. Assessment surveys suggest that most students ended the projects with greater appreciation for sociotechnical perspectives on the interconnection of engineering and corporate social responsibility (CSR). This suggests that undergraduate engineering education can be a generative place to prepare future professionals to see how engineering can promote social and environmental wellbeing. Comparing the different groups of students points to the power of authentic learning experiences with industry engineers and interdisciplinary teaching by faculty.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Smith, J., McClelland, C., & Restrepo, O. J. (2023). Sociotechnical Undergraduate Education for the Future of Natural Resource Production. Mining, 3(2), 387–398. https://doi.org/10.3390/mining3020023

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free