A critical analysis of the representations of older adults in the field of human–robot interaction

30Citations
Citations of this article
46Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper argues that there is a need to critically assess bias in the representations of older adults in the field of Human–Robot Interaction. This need stems from the recognition that technology development is a socially constructed process that has the potential to reinforce problematic understandings of older adults. Based on a qualitative content analysis of 96 academic publications, this paper indicates that older adults are represented as; frail by default, independent by effort; silent and technologically illiterate; burdensome; and problematic for society. Within these documents, few counternarratives are present that do not take such essentialist representations. In these texts, the goal of social robots in elder care is to “enable” older adults to “better” themselves. The older body is seen as “fixable” with social robots, reinforcing an ageist and neoliberal narrative: older adults are reduced to potential care receivers in ways that shift care responsibilities away from the welfare state onto the individual.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burema, D. (2022). A critical analysis of the representations of older adults in the field of human–robot interaction. AI and Society, 37(2), 455–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-021-01205-0

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free