Abstract
This paper examines airport privatization and various forms of airport regulation, taking into account of behavior of public administration and non-aeronautical service of an airport. First, we find that the regulator may set the price of non-aeronautical service lower than its marginal cost in order to counteract a high airport charge, if it can regulate non-aeronautical service. Second, price-cap regulation on aeronautical service could reduce airport charge, but also introduce an underinvestment in airport capacity that could lower social welfare. Whether price-cap or cost-based regulation is superior depends on the relative importance of the underinvestment effect under price-cap regulation, versus a regulatory waste associated with cost-based regulation.
Author supplied keywords
- Aeronautical service
- Airline competition
- Airport privatization
- Capacity investment
- Competition among non-aeronautical service providers
- Cost-based regulation
- Dual-till regulation
- Market distortion
- Non-aeronautical service
- Price-cap regulation
- Public Airport
- Regulator behavior
- Regulatory waste
- Single-till regulation
- Social welfare
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Kidokoro, Y., & Zhang, A. (2023). Airport Privatization and Regulation: Effects on Airport Charge, Capacity, and Social Welfare. In Advances in Spatial Science (pp. 125–169). Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-20341-1_6
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.