Controlled, Constrained, or Flexible? How Self-Management Goals Are Shaped By Patient–Provider Interactions

45Citations
Citations of this article
49Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

A person-centered approach to goal-setting, involving collaboration between patients and health professionals, is advocated in policy to support self-management. However, this is difficult to achieve in practice, reducing the potential effectiveness of self-management support. Drawing on observations of consultations between patients and health professionals, we examined how goal-setting is shaped in patient–provider interactions. Analysis revealed three distinct interactional styles. In controlled interactions, health professionals determine patients’ goals based on biomedical reference points and present these goals as something patients should do. In constrained interactions, patients are invited to present goals, yet health professionals’ language and questions orientate goals toward biomedical issues. In flexible interactions, patients and professionals both contribute to goal-setting, as health professionals use less directive language, create openings, and allow patients to decide on their goals. Findings suggest that interactional style of health professionals could be the focus of interventions when aiming to increase the effectiveness of goal-setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Franklin, M., Lewis, S., Willis, K., Rogers, A., Venville, A., & Smith, L. (2019). Controlled, Constrained, or Flexible? How Self-Management Goals Are Shaped By Patient–Provider Interactions. Qualitative Health Research, 29(4), 557–567. https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732318774324

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free