Multiple Representation-Based Learning through Cognitive Dissonance Strategy to Reduce Student’s Misconceptions in Volumetric Analysis

5Citations
Citations of this article
68Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study aimed to determine the contribution of multiple representation-based learning through cognitive dissonance strategy and to reduce misconceptions encountered by chemistry students. A mixed method research with the embedded experimental design was employed in this study involving 66 sophomore students enrolled in the Basics of Analytical Chemistry class. This study used a three-tier test diagnostic test of 43 questions that had been validated by the education teams and chemists. The analysis was done by using a t-test and N-gain. The results showed a significant difference between the experimental and the control classes and a greater increase in N-gain in the experimental class (68.56%) compared to the control class (42.42%). The most effective reduction of misconceptions occurred in the subject of argentometric titration, from 33.41 to 8.79%. This indicates that MRCD cannot completely eliminate misconceptions, especially for concepts related to sub-microscopic and symbolic representations.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Widarti, H. R., Permanasari, A., Mulyani, S., Rokhim, D. A., & Habiddin. (2021). Multiple Representation-Based Learning through Cognitive Dissonance Strategy to Reduce Student’s Misconceptions in Volumetric Analysis. TEM Journal, 10(3), 1263–1273. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM103-33

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free