Can the psychosocial safety climate reduce ill-health presenteeism? Evidence from chinese healthcare staff under a dual information processing path lens

24Citations
Citations of this article
65Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Because of heavy workloads, non-transferable responsibilities, and shift systems, healthcare staff are prone to ill-health presenteeism. Based on social information processing theory, this study explored the influence of the psychosocial safety climate (PSC) on ill-health presenteeism. The mediating effects of perceived instrumental support and perceived emotional support and the moderating effect of organic structure in this process were observed. Using a time-lagged research design, data from 386 healthcare staff were gathered and multiple regression and bootstrapping were used to test each hypothesis. The results showed that: (1) PSC negatively relates to ill-health presenteeism. (2) Both perceived instrumental support and perceived emotional support mediate the relationship between PSC and ill-health presenteeism. The affective information processing path is more effective than the cognitive information processing path, but they do not convey a positive interaction effect on ill-health presenteeism. (3) The organic structure moderates the mediating effect of perceived emotional support but does not exert a significant moderating effect on the mediating process of perceived instrumental support. This study particularly identified PSC as a contextual antecedent of ill-health presenteeism. By combining organizational, work-related, and person-related factors, a more comprehensive theoretical framework for the understanding of ill-health presenteeism is developed, thus informing health promotion management.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Liu, B., Lu, Q., Zhao, Y., & Zhan, J. (2020). Can the psychosocial safety climate reduce ill-health presenteeism? Evidence from chinese healthcare staff under a dual information processing path lens. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(8). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17082969

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free