Epilogue: The Scandal! of the Refugee: Some Reflections on the “Inter” of International Relations

Abstract

The refugee is a scandal for philosophy in that the refugee recalls the radical instability of meaning and the in caicul ability of the human. The refugee is a scandal for politics also, however, in that the advent of the refugee is always a reproach to the formation of the political order or subjectivity which necessarily gives rise to the refugee. The scandal is intensified for any politics of identity which presupposes that the goal of politics is the realization of sovereign identity. The principal argument, then, is that what I will call the scandal of the refugee illuminates both the fundamental ontological determinations of international politics and the character of political action, because the refugee is both a function of the intentional political destruction of the ontological horizons of people's always already heterogeneous worlds, and effects an equally fundamental deconstruction of the ontological horizons which constitute the equally heterogeneous worlds into which, as refugees, these people are precipitated. It is precisely on this concrete and corporeal sijte that both the ontological horizons and the allied political decision-making of modern politics are thrown into starfc relief and profoundly called into question. For it is precisely here that the very actions of modem politics both create and address the incidence of its own massive and self-generated, political abjection. If that is one of the principal ends of international relations, one is forced to ask, what does it take as its beginning? I f, in other words, the vernacular political architecture of modem international power commonly produces l:lE forcibly displaced people globally, one is inclined to ask about the foundations upon which that architecture is itself based.