Comparison between Performance of De-ionized Water and Al2O3/De-ionized Water on Enhancing the Transportation of Heat in Small Space

3Citations
Citations of this article
16Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In this article, the influence of deionized water and Al2O3/deionized water nanofluid to cooling battery ambient temperature is shown in figure 1. The battery temperature is observed to be decrease as the Al2O3/deionized water nanofluids volume concentration and high flow rate is incremented. The Al2O3/deionized water nanofluid exhibits enhancement as compared to deionized water under laminar flow conditions. The 0.60 vol. % concentration of Al2O3 with 10g surfactant and 1 L/min flow rate gives the highest heat transfer rate value among all with 65 % higher as compared to deionized water at laminar flow was observed. It has been observed that 24 hr of ultra-sonication was the best duration in the presence of a surfactant, where it gives the best stability and improved thermal conductivity, this improvement is due to decrease of aggregates within nanoparticle.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Bin-Abdun, N. A., Razlan, Z. M., Bakar, S. A., Voon, C. H., Wan, W. K., Zunaidi, I., … Noriman, N. Z. (2019). Comparison between Performance of De-ionized Water and Al2O3/De-ionized Water on Enhancing the Transportation of Heat in Small Space. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering (Vol. 557). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/557/1/012051

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free