Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models

7Citations
Citations of this article
13Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

The performances of photomultiplier tube (PMT)-based dedicated breast positron emission tomography (PET) and silicon photomultiplier tube (SiPM)-based time-of-flight (TOF) PET, which is applicable not only to breast imaging but also to head imaging, were compared using a phantom study. A cylindrical phantom containing four spheres (3–10 mm in diameter) filled with 18F-FDG at two signal-to-background ratios (SBRs), 4:1 and 8:1, was scanned. The phantom images, which were reconstructed using three-dimensional list-mode dynamic row-action maximum likelihood algorithm with various β-values and post-smoothing filters, were visually and quantitatively compared. Visual evaluation showed that the 3 mm sphere was more clearly visualized with higher β and smaller post-filters, while the background was noisier; SiPM-based TOF-PET was superior to PMT-based dbPET in sharpness, smoothness, and detectability, although the background was noisier at the SBR of 8:1. Quantitative evaluation revealed that the detection index (DI) and recovery coefficient (CRC) of SiPM-based TOF-PET images were higher than those of PMT-based PET images, despite a higher background coefficient of variation (CVBG). The two organ-specific PET systems showed that a 3 mm lesion in the breast could be visualized at the center of the detector, and there was less noise in the SiPM-based TOF-PET image.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Satoh, Y., Hanaoka, K., Ikegawa, C., Imai, M., Watanabe, S., Morimoto-Ishikawa, D., … Ishii, K. (2023). Organ-Specific Positron Emission Tomography Scanners for Breast Imaging: Comparison between the Performances of Prior and Novel Models. Diagnostics, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics13061079

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free