Abstract
The wound-scratch assay is a widely used in vitro model for studying collective cell migration, a fundamental process contributing to wound closure and re-epithelialisation. Owing to its simplicity, low cost, and adaptability, it has become a foundational tool for early-stage wound-healing research and therapeutic screening. The assay involves generating a defined gap in a confluent cell monolayer and monitoring gap closure over time as a surrogate readout of repair. This narrative review examined 199 published studies, identifying 73 relevant to wound healing. A technical hierarchy of wound creation methods was identified across three main categories: mechanical approaches (e.g., pipette tips and cell scrapers), accessible but prone to operator-dependent variability; semi-automated systems (e.g., inserts and wound maker devices), which improve reproducibility; and fully-automated robotic platforms offering high precision and high-throughput capability. While these advances enhance technical consistency, they do not overcome the assay's fundamental biological constraints. Importantly, gap closure in the wound-scratch assay primarily reflects planar collective cell migration and does not recapitulate the integrated inflammatory, vascular, metabolic, and extracellular matrix-dependent processes that govern wound repair in vivo. Consequently, bioactive compounds acting through antioxidant, anti-inflammatory, angiogenic, or matrix-modulating pathways may have their therapeutic potential underestimated or misclassified when assessed using migration-only readouts. Preliminary in-house (unpublished) data are presented to illustrate this limitation, demonstrating modest migration effects for compounds with established wound-healing activity in vivo. Despite these limitations, the wound-scratch assay remains a valuable first-line, hypothesis-generating tool when interpreted appropriately, with future utility dependent on integration with adapted models and complementary assays for translation.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Molefe, P. F., Ghasemishahrestani, Z., Khumalo, N. P., & Bayat, A. (2026, June 1). The In Vitro Wound-Scratch Assay: Applications, Technical Advances, and Limitations in Wound Healing Research. International Wound Journal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.70964
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.