Patient reported outcomes in routine care: Advancing data capture for HIV cohort research

81Citations
Citations of this article
125Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Introduction. Computerized collection of standardized measures of patient reported outcomes (PROs) provides a novel paradigm for data capture at the point of clinical care. Comparisons between data from PROs and Electronic Health Records (EHR) are lacking. We compare EHR and PRO for capture of depression and substance abuse and their relationship to adherence to antiretroviral therapy (ART). Methods. This retrospective study includes HIV-positive patients at an HIV clinic who completed an initial PRO assessment April 2008-July 2009. The questionnaire includes measures of depression (PHQ-9) and substance abuse (ASSIST). Self-reported ART adherence was modeled using separate logistic regression analyses (EHR vs PRO). Results. The study included 782 participants. EHR vs PRO diagnosis of current substance abuse was 13% (n = 99) vs 6% (n = 45) (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kozak, M. S., Mugavero, M. J., Ye, J., Aban, I., Lawrence, S. T., Nevin, C. R., … Willig, J. H. (2012). Patient reported outcomes in routine care: Advancing data capture for HIV cohort research. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 54(1), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cir727

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free